The new Building Safety Regulator (BSR) is expected to be operational in about two years, according to a senior official at the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).
Speaking at a Westminster Forum Projects conference on the future of building safety and regulation, Senior HSE Policy Advisor Sarah Mallagh said it would take between 21 and 24 months for the organization is launched.
“We believe that it will take between nine and twelve months to [Building Safety] The bill must be submitted to parliament and then another 12 months before the building safety regulator is operational, ”she said.
Contractors will need to show BSR that staff and the supply chain can keep their buildings safe. The checks and balances provided throughout the construction process should mean that the BSR does not find any fire safety issues when it examines buildings at a later stage, according to Peter Baker (pictured), chief building inspector at HSE and head of the new BSR. He said Construction News in March that the industry must move away from “over-reliance on the building control body which is the final control and arbiter of safety.”
The government announced the formation of BSR following Dame Judith Hackitt’s independent review of building and fire safety regulations, which was released in 2018. In the review, Hackitt criticized the absence formal process to ensure the skills of contractors, sub-contractors and others were involved in the construction of high-rise buildings as the main factor that led to the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017, during of which 72 people lost their lives.
Speakers at yesterday’s online conference also warned that the industry is focusing on profit rather than other values, which they believe could lead to higher costs for the company. to come up.
Peter Caplehorn, managing director of the Construction Products Authority (CPA), said the process of improving building safety will initially be difficult and expensive, as it involves challenging the industry’s sole focus on cost as a determining factor. He said the industry has fallen into “behaviors that are only driven by cost and speed”, and that “in doing so, we are also missing some of the key factors that produce a quality building”.
“For me, it’s about the realism that if we’re going to have properly competent people, adhering to regulations, making sure they take care of what they put together – how they design it, buy it and make it happen. build. it – it will certainly cost more in the short run.
But last May, Hackitt said she feared the HSE might not have enough resources to enforce building safety when the BSR was ready to go.
This is not the first time the industry has been accused of focusing on profit. Last year, architect Paul Hyett told the Grenfell Tower Inquiry that the construction industry was “oriented with an emphasis on engineering costs and value at the expense of safety.”
Now in its second phase, the investigation has established that companies involved in the manufacture, sale and installation of flammable materials on Grenfell Tower knew they were fire hazards. He found that the aluminum composite material (ACM) cladding, which has a polyethylene core, and the PIR insulation caused the fire to spread rapidly through the tower.